It started as a dream—a home extension that would transform Rob and Lucy Davies’ house in Langdon Hills into a cozy haven. They envisioned a new kitchen, an open-plan living area, and a space where memories would unfold. Instead, they found themselves caught in a nightmare. Just two months into the project, Basildon Council’s building control team halted the construction, citing serious breaches of building regulations.
Steve Figg, the builder they had trusted, was at the center of it all. The Davies had paid him £44,000 for the work, but what they got in return was chaos. Rob described their home as looking “like a bomb site.” Exposed walls, unfinished structures—everything felt precarious, as if their very safety hung by a thread. They spent an additional £28,000 just to secure their property after the work stopped.
But things took an even darker turn. Figg reported the couple to police, alleging harassment and claiming he wanted to kill them. This led to the Davies being held in police custody for 22 hours—a shocking twist that left them reeling. “It was a complete nightmare… It tested our marriage hugely,” Rob recalled, still grappling with the emotional toll.
In court, Figg pleaded guilty to 22 breaches of building regulations. The ramifications were severe: he received a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, and was ordered to wear an electronically monitored tag for six months. He was also instructed to pay £85,000 in damages to the Davies—an amount that reflected not just the financial loss but the emotional upheaval they endured.
The case has sparked discussions about homeowner rights and the risks associated with construction disputes. Officials from Basildon Council emphasized that this situation serves as a stark reminder of what can happen when builders fail to comply with safety standards. “The problem was not just delay or poor workmanship; it was repeated non-compliance that left a family dealing with a property described in court as unsafe,” one official stated.
As the dust settles on this turbulent saga, both parties are left to pick up the pieces. The Davies hope to rebuild—not just their home but also their sense of security and trust. Figg’s future remains uncertain; his reputation tarnished by this legal battle and its consequences.
This case highlights an urgent need for transparency in construction projects and awareness among homeowners about their rights. When dreams of home extensions turn into nightmares, it’s crucial that families know where to turn for help—and how to protect themselves from builders who may not have their best interests at heart.
You may also like
